summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/.md/thoughts/society/social-media-human-experimentation.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authormjfernez <mjf@mjfer.net>2026-06-28 14:44:00 -0400
committermjfernez <mjf@mjfer.net>2026-06-28 14:44:00 -0400
commit62e8467e59d7d30d7cbda080f6b5f1d37a17d905 (patch)
tree3d7c7797862bfdd0efe19d991ba5180eed689f7d /.md/thoughts/society/social-media-human-experimentation.md
parent15a267bf0a5d47ec0189261d1ce0cfd5e4268c66 (diff)
2026 Touch up, mostly FAQ
Diffstat (limited to '.md/thoughts/society/social-media-human-experimentation.md')
-rw-r--r--.md/thoughts/society/social-media-human-experimentation.md67
1 files changed, 67 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.md/thoughts/society/social-media-human-experimentation.md b/.md/thoughts/society/social-media-human-experimentation.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1cb35fe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.md/thoughts/society/social-media-human-experimentation.md
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+This document contains references to all instances of unethical human
+experimentation committed by social media companies. The credit for this
+of course goes to the respective authors who have done the real work of
+documenting these crimes against humanity.
+
+So there is no confusion, I define "unethical human experimentation" by
+the ten points of the Nuremberg Code (emphasis my own).
+
+Content is directly from:
+https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Code#The_ten_points_of_the_Nuremberg_Code
+
+
+
+1. *The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.*
+ This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to
+ give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free
+ power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force,
+ fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of
+ constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and
+ comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to
+ enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This
+ latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative
+ decision by the experimental subject there *should be made known to
+ him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment*; the method
+ and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and
+ hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or
+ person which may possibly come from his participation in the
+ experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality
+ of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or
+ engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility
+ which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
+2. The experiment should be such as to yield *fruitful results for the
+ good of society*, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and
+ not random and unnecessary in nature.
+3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of
+ animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the
+ disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results
+ will justify the performance of the experiment.
+4. The experiment should be so conducted as to **avoid all unnecessary
+ physical and mental suffering and injury**.
+5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason
+ to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except,
+ perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also
+ serve as subjects.
+6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by
+ the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the
+ experiment.
+7. **Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided
+ to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities
+ of injury, disability, or death.**
+8. *The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified
+ persons*. The highest degree of skill and care should be required
+ through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage
+ in the experiment.
+9. **During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at
+ liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the
+ physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems
+ to him to be impossible.**
+10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be
+ prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has
+ probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith,
+ superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a
+ continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury,
+ disability, or death to the experimental subject.
+
+
+## INSTAGRAM (META)