diff options
author | mjfernez <mjf@mjfer.net> | 2023-07-11 23:21:59 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | mjfernez <mjf@mjfer.net> | 2023-07-11 23:23:10 -0400 |
commit | 27bc09d8ce0a32cdc2fd5688faeaa380ad94edfd (patch) | |
tree | 6f79cf2717d949b7dc18f3b662574949add83445 /.md/thoughts/net | |
parent | 64cc489d6f463bc6b242dcc5c61a7ce6359f9aac (diff) | |
download | site-files-27bc09d8ce0a32cdc2fd5688faeaa380ad94edfd.tar.gz |
Removed garbage thoughts, small edits
Diffstat (limited to '.md/thoughts/net')
-rw-r--r-- | .md/thoughts/net/in-defense-of-anonymity.md | 69 |
1 files changed, 69 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/.md/thoughts/net/in-defense-of-anonymity.md b/.md/thoughts/net/in-defense-of-anonymity.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..698da69 --- /dev/null +++ b/.md/thoughts/net/in-defense-of-anonymity.md @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +## Thesis + +The idea of a digital identification system has been gaining popularity +in recent years. While I'm not opposed to the idea of current government +ID becoming more "digital" I am opposed to some of the expansions that +some seem to be proposing--some even suggesting that ID ought to be +required to use the Internet at all. In the same vein, some have +suggested draconian punishments for those who mock or imitate them +online anonymously or pseudonmously. + +I think at this moment it should be stated on no uncertain terms that +the right to be anonymous online is crucial and must be defended. There +are no doubt consequences to this freedom: all freedoms have consequeces +if they are not excercised with responsibility. That's exactly why I +want to carefully lay out why we need such a right in the first place. +Not only do I believe this right is critical for individuals to combat +the growing influence of privatized surveillance in their daily lives, +but it is critical for our free press, our national security and police +forces, as well as our elected leaders that networked anonymous +communication be available to the public. + +## What is anonymity + +### What about Tor + +Tor is a system that enhances the privacy and protection of the +typical TCP/IP and HTTPS communications outlined in the last section by +bouncing the user's connection through several other computers, each +applying their own layer of encyption. Unless an operator owns all of +the computers the user bounces through, this provides two primary +advantages in anonymity: + +1. The user's true IP address and location cannot be known +2. Any particular user's intended destination is difficult to know + without correlating time of connection to Tor (from an ISP) with the + time of exit from Tor (at the "exit node"). If the destination is a + hidden service, this typically cannot be known. + +Tor was originally developed, at least in part, to give US agents an +advantage in covert operations. If the technology could make it so their +suspects had no idea who they were, it made it much easier to run +operations and gain useful intel from that person. This was articulated +by original Tor developer XXX: + +Tor is still used in a similar capacity by law enforcement today. +In addition to it's routine use in infiltrating pedophile chat +networks, FBI agents famously used the anonymity Tor provided +to gain the trust of the operator of the first darknet marketplace: the +Silk Road. + +## Why anonymity is important for national security + +## Why anonymity is important for journalism, law, and justice + +## Why anonymity is important for the public and greater society + +## Where does digital ID fit in? + +As stated at the top of this document, I am opposed to the erasure of +online anonymity, but not to government digital identification in +general. In the United States, we have a requirement to get a license +before you can drive a car and the license generally serves as your ID. +I don't think that's an unreasonable requirement for a car. And I don't +think it's an unreasonable requirement for certain services on the +Internet. + +... + + |