From d96c7cad92b025ad80a8fe64f91d1c215272e313 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mjfernez Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 12:09:06 -0400 Subject: Update dead links. Add gfx card tutorial --- tutorials/www/how-to-use-the-internet.html | 36 +++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) (limited to 'tutorials/www/how-to-use-the-internet.html') diff --git a/tutorials/www/how-to-use-the-internet.html b/tutorials/www/how-to-use-the-internet.html index 9f0e227..88692cf 100644 --- a/tutorials/www/how-to-use-the-internet.html +++ b/tutorials/www/how-to-use-the-internet.html @@ -179,20 +179,18 @@ browse anonymously

Why?

-

Changing times and a forgetful youth have forced me to write this -guide.

-

I am increasingly disturbed by the amount of people I meet (young and -old) that navigate their lives at least in part online, but are unable -to use the internet for it's intended purpose: finding infomation. -Writing to someone or posting a picture of your cat seems to be second -nature for most people, but converting a picture from a PDF or looking -up a study (or even a word!) you saw in an article is something else -entirely.

-

For the most part, it is not anyone's fault or laziness. It's the -fault of what the internet has become. For one, there's just so -much more stuff now; it's hard to know exactly where to start -and who to trust. And so much of that stuff is now garbage, -either in the way it's presented--with disruptive ads that don't close +

Why would anyone want to use the Internet, really?

+

Unfortunately, almost none of us use the Internet for it's intended +purpose: finding infomation.

+

Writing to someone or posting a picture of your cat seems to be +second nature for most people, but converting a picture from a PDF or +looking up a study (or even a word!) you saw in an article is something +else entirely.

+

While that's in part the fault of our laziness, it's equally the +fault of what the Internet has become. For one, there's just so much +more stuff now; it's hard to know exactly where to start and +who to trust. And so much of that stuff is now garbage, either +in the way it's presented--with disruptive ads that don't close correctly--or in the way it's written--vague, misleading, or straight incorrect. But for seconds: no one really teaches you how to use this thing do they? There are no courses on "How to use a search engine" or @@ -223,13 +221,9 @@ scholarly articles

A common complaint lodged at me whenever I recommend Wikipedia is that it's not a source of truth since they found X mistake somewhere, or made Y edit when they were a teenager that's still there. No one has -ever (or should ever) claim Wikipedia is reliable. Frankly, you should -not consider any source to be reliable, but that's a separate -issue. If you know how to use Wikipedia you can use it to get closer to -a true understanding of whatever you're studying.

-

For starters, as a general rule, you should not trust anything you -read on a topic that is less than 20 years old. We're still living -through the history at this point and new things can come to light.

+ever (or should ever) claim Wikipedia is a source of truth on it's own. +But you can use it to find more sources and maybe get a little +closer.

How to find articles with Google Scholar

Advanced Topics

-- cgit v1.2.3