From d96c7cad92b025ad80a8fe64f91d1c215272e313 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mjfernez Changing times and a forgetful youth have forced me to write this
-guide. I am increasingly disturbed by the amount of people I meet (young and
-old) that navigate their lives at least in part online, but are unable
-to use the internet for it's intended purpose: finding infomation.
-Writing to someone or posting a picture of your cat seems to be second
-nature for most people, but converting a picture from a PDF or looking
-up a study (or even a word!) you saw in an article is something else
-entirely. For the most part, it is not anyone's fault or laziness. It's the
-fault of what the internet has become. For one, there's just so
-much more stuff now; it's hard to know exactly where to start
-and who to trust. And so much of that stuff is now garbage,
-either in the way it's presented--with disruptive ads that don't close
+ Why would anyone want to use the Internet, really? Unfortunately, almost none of us use the Internet for it's intended
+purpose: finding infomation. Writing to someone or posting a picture of your cat seems to be
+second nature for most people, but converting a picture from a PDF or
+looking up a study (or even a word!) you saw in an article is something
+else entirely. While that's in part the fault of our laziness, it's equally the
+fault of what the Internet has become. For one, there's just so much
+more stuff now; it's hard to know exactly where to start and
+who to trust. And so much of that stuff is now garbage, either
+in the way it's presented--with disruptive ads that don't close
correctly--or in the way it's written--vague, misleading, or straight
incorrect. But for seconds: no one really teaches you how to use this
thing do they? There are no courses on "How to use a search engine" or
@@ -223,13 +221,9 @@ scholarly articles
A common complaint lodged at me whenever I recommend Wikipedia is
that it's not a source of truth since they found X mistake somewhere, or
made Y edit when they were a teenager that's still there. No one has
-ever (or should ever) claim Wikipedia is reliable. Frankly, you should
-not consider any source to be reliable, but that's a separate
-issue. If you know how to use Wikipedia you can use it to get closer to
-a true understanding of whatever you're studying. For starters, as a general rule, you should not trust anything you
-read on a topic that is less than 20 years old. We're still living
-through the history at this point and new things can come to light.Why?
-